In the ever-evolving landscape of Ontario’s anti-SLAPP laws, navigating uncertainty has become essential. As courts grapple with balancing free expression and protecting against frivolous lawsuits, emerging trends signal shifts that stakeholders must monitor closely.
In a province often championed for its openness, concerns over Ontario’s freedom of expression have emerged under Premier Ford’s leadership. As policies shift, many are left asking: have the voices of dissent been stifled in the name of order?
In the complex interplay of property rights and public access, the University of Toronto case stands as a pivotal example of trespass law. As legal boundaries are tested, both sides navigate the delicate balance between institutional authority and individual freedoms.
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Canada evaluated the intricate balance of counter-speech in protecting free expression. By affirming its vital role in a democratic society, the Court highlights the ongoing dialogue between free speech and its responsible limits.